<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dw="https://www.dreamwidth.org">
  <id>tag:dreamwidth.org,2009-05-01:162179</id>
  <title>almostwitty</title>
  <subtitle>almostwitty</subtitle>
  <author>
    <name>almostwitty</name>
  </author>
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://almostwitty.dreamwidth.org/"/>
  <link rel="self" type="text/xml" href="https://almostwitty.dreamwidth.org/data/atom"/>
  <updated>2011-10-20T13:05:06Z</updated>
  <dw:journal username="almostwitty" type="personal"/>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:dreamwidth.org,2009-05-01:162179:580404</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://almostwitty.dreamwidth.org/580404.html"/>
    <link rel="self" type="text/xml" href="https://almostwitty.dreamwidth.org/data/atom/?itemid=580404"/>
    <title>Can a TV Powerdown unit ruin your television?</title>
    <published>2011-10-20T13:05:06Z</published>
    <updated>2011-10-20T13:05:06Z</updated>
    <category term="green"/>
    <category term="oooh"/>
    <category term="shiny thing"/>
    <category term="energysaving"/>
    <category term="lcd"/>
    <category term="life"/>
    <category term="tv"/>
    <category term="technology"/>
    <category term="television"/>
    <category term="tvpowerdown"/>
    <category term="intelliplug"/>
    <dw:security>public</dw:security>
    <dw:reply-count>0</dw:reply-count>
    <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;&lt;div class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 260px"&gt;&lt;img alt="TV Intelliplug" src="http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/41pRCIyltzL._SL500_AA300_.jpg" title="A TV Intelliplug" width="250" height="250" /&gt;&lt;p class="wp-caption-text"&gt;A TV Intelliplug&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt; Being environmentally minded (and trying to save money), I recently bought a &lt;a href="http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/B00133OLI0/ref=as_li_ss_tl?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;tag=auk1&amp;amp;linkCode=as2&amp;amp;camp=1634&amp;amp;creative=19450&amp;amp;creativeASIN=B00133OLI0"&gt;TV Intelliplug&lt;/a&gt; to cut down on energy costs. The idea of the gadget is that when you switch the TV off into stand-by, the unit will then cut off all electricity supplies to your TV and associated gadgets, saving energy and a little bit of cash. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Unfortunately, when I applied it to my TV, it didn&amp;#8217;t quite work. And ever since then (even with the unit removed), the TV has been slow to react from standby. It&amp;#8217;ll try to flicker to life, but then give up &amp;#8211; like a baby trying to sit himself up. It&amp;#8217;ll try and try again, and finally manage to flicker to life properly a few minutes later. We&amp;#8217;ve had to call a TV Repair man in.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Is it possible that such a unit could have done some damage to my LCD TV?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style="text-align: right"&gt;&lt;small&gt;Mirrored from &lt;a href="http://www.almostwitty.com/14924/life/can-a-tv-powerdown-unit-ruin-your-television" title="Read Original Post"&gt;almost witty&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;img src="https://www.dreamwidth.org/tools/commentcount?user=almostwitty&amp;ditemid=580404" width="30" height="12" alt="comment count unavailable" style="vertical-align: middle;"/&gt; comments</content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:dreamwidth.org,2009-05-01:162179:575746</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://almostwitty.dreamwidth.org/575746.html"/>
    <link rel="self" type="text/xml" href="https://almostwitty.dreamwidth.org/data/atom/?itemid=575746"/>
    <title>Tell my wife why we need an XBox 360 with Kinect&amp;#8230;</title>
    <published>2011-09-20T12:08:42Z</published>
    <updated>2011-09-20T12:08:42Z</updated>
    <category term="games"/>
    <category term="adayinthelife"/>
    <category term="xbox"/>
    <category term="kinect"/>
    <category term="technology"/>
    <dw:security>public</dw:security>
    <dw:reply-count>0</dw:reply-count>
    <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;Our household currently has a Playstation 3 and a Wii &amp;#8211; both game consoles acquired before the arrival of the baby. Oddly enough, aside from the odd spurt of gaming &lt;em&gt;(mostly Portal 2, Wii Fit, Goldeneye and Crysis 2)&lt;/em&gt;, the game consoles have mostly sat in the corner unplayed, due to the lack of time available. Who knew that dealing with a baby was a time-sucking vortex?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Now we have the opportunity to buy a brand-new XBox 360 with Kinect at a relatively cheap price. I&amp;#8217;m severley tempted, mostly on the grounds that we could play Dance Central (my wife tends to prefer the active dancey-type games) and control the TV using our voice &amp;#8211; something that would undoubtedly come in handy since the baby has taken to playing with the TV remote control at all times.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;What other arguments can I deploy to persuade my wife that we simply must have all three game consoles? &lt;img src="http://www.almostwitty.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif" alt=":)" class="wp-smiley" /&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style="text-align: right"&gt;&lt;small&gt;Mirrored from &lt;a href="http://www.almostwitty.com/14823/adayinthelife/tell-my-wife-why-we-need-an-x-box-360-with-kinect" title="Read Original Post"&gt;almost witty&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;img src="https://www.dreamwidth.org/tools/commentcount?user=almostwitty&amp;ditemid=575746" width="30" height="12" alt="comment count unavailable" style="vertical-align: middle;"/&gt; comments</content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:dreamwidth.org,2009-05-01:162179:298805</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://almostwitty.dreamwidth.org/298805.html"/>
    <link rel="self" type="text/xml" href="https://almostwitty.dreamwidth.org/data/atom/?itemid=298805"/>
    <title>How Tywyn thwarts Google Street View&amp;#8230;</title>
    <published>2010-03-11T12:26:52Z</published>
    <updated>2010-03-11T12:26:52Z</updated>
    <category term="tywyn"/>
    <category term="wales"/>
    <category term="google"/>
    <category term="technology"/>
    <dw:security>public</dw:security>
    <dw:reply-count>0</dw:reply-count>
    <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;Google Street View has thrillingly &amp;#8211; and rather scarily &amp;#8211; managed to scan &lt;a href="http://www.trustedreviews.com/software/news/2010/03/11/Google-Maps-Extends-Street-View-to-Every-UK-Road/p1"&gt;95% of the homes in the UK&lt;/a&gt;. Which means that most of my childhood haunts are finally on Google Maps for an easy trip down nostalgia street.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;However, when I try to go down &lt;a href="http://maps.google.co.uk/maps?f=q&amp;amp;source=s_q&amp;amp;hl=en&amp;amp;geocode=&amp;amp;q=13+College+Green,+Tywyn&amp;amp;sll=53.384673,-3.031952&amp;amp;sspn=0.001206,0.003463&amp;amp;ie=UTF8&amp;amp;hq=&amp;amp;hnear=13+College+Green,+Tywyn,+Gwynedd+LL36+9,+United+Kingdom&amp;amp;ll=52.58724,-4.086689&amp;amp;spn=0.001229,0.003463&amp;amp;z=19&amp;amp;layer=c&amp;amp;cbll=52.587156,-4.08685&amp;amp;panoid=lghO1AJ4yMwoOV8GhcLGyw&amp;amp;cbp=12,57.89,,0,6.39"&gt;this street in Tywyn&lt;/a&gt; and then move forward, I am magically transported through some mysterious blurred tunnel to another place in time and space. Also known as the back alley. Then I&amp;#8217;m transported back. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Such a shame I can&amp;#8217;t seem to find a way to tell Google how to correct their mistake. Unless there is a teleportation tunnel operating in Tywyn these days&amp;#8230;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style="text-align: right"&gt;&lt;small&gt;Mirrored from &lt;a href="http://www.almostwitty.com/technology/how-tywyn-thwarts-google-street-view" title="Read Original Post"&gt;almost witty&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;img src="https://www.dreamwidth.org/tools/commentcount?user=almostwitty&amp;ditemid=298805" width="30" height="12" alt="comment count unavailable" style="vertical-align: middle;"/&gt; comments</content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:dreamwidth.org,2009-05-01:162179:286214</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://almostwitty.dreamwidth.org/286214.html"/>
    <link rel="self" type="text/xml" href="https://almostwitty.dreamwidth.org/data/atom/?itemid=286214"/>
    <title>Can we get a Secret Santa 2.0 going by next week? Y&amp;#8217;know, for charity&amp;#8230;</title>
    <published>2009-12-01T12:28:06Z</published>
    <updated>2009-12-01T12:28:06Z</updated>
    <category term="adayinthelife"/>
    <category term="technology"/>
    <dw:security>public</dw:security>
    <dw:reply-count>0</dw:reply-count>
    <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;Time was, when the UK blogosphere was concentrated in the power of a few key individuals, &lt;a href="http://web.archive.org/web/20041031012236/www.thinkblank.com/santa2003/"&gt;thinkblank.com&lt;/a&gt; had a Secret Santa every year where you could give a random blogger a gift, and get a random gift back. The great thing with this approach was that you were almost encouraged to stalk said blogger for a while, to see what they&amp;#8217;d like and want.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This year, the only example of a Web Secret Santa I&amp;#8217;ve found so far has been Firebox&amp;#8217;s &lt;a href="http://globalsecretsanta.com/"&gt;Global Secret Santa&lt;/a&gt;, whereby you buy a gift (from a limited range) for someone via Firebox, and someone else buys you a gift (from the same limited range). Which almost seems a step backwards in the world of Secret Santas.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So &amp;#8230; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Would there be any interest in a Web 2.0 Secret Santa for bloggers whereby people register, they&amp;#8217;re given the details of someone else who&amp;#8217;s registered, and told to buy an appropriate gift worth £10 or less for them? Optionally, if they buy it through an affiliate site like Amazon, the commission is then donated to a charity&amp;#8230;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Are there any savvy database types who could knock up an appropriate database and website in 7 days?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Is this a really really stupid idea?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style="text-align: right"&gt;&lt;small&gt;Mirrored from &lt;a href="http://www.almostwitty.com/adayinthelife/can-we-get-a-secret-santa-2-0-going-by-next-week-yknow-for-charity" title="Read Original Post"&gt;almost witty&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;img src="https://www.dreamwidth.org/tools/commentcount?user=almostwitty&amp;ditemid=286214" width="30" height="12" alt="comment count unavailable" style="vertical-align: middle;"/&gt; comments</content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:dreamwidth.org,2009-05-01:162179:283989</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://almostwitty.dreamwidth.org/283989.html"/>
    <link rel="self" type="text/xml" href="https://almostwitty.dreamwidth.org/data/atom/?itemid=283989"/>
    <title>Why Google Maps Navigation won&amp;#8217;t be that huge</title>
    <published>2009-10-30T11:25:12Z</published>
    <updated>2009-10-30T11:25:12Z</updated>
    <category term="google"/>
    <category term="technology"/>
    <dw:security>public</dw:security>
    <dw:reply-count>1</dw:reply-count>
    <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;So, &lt;a href="http://mashable.com/2009/10/29/google-maps-navigation-huge/"&gt;Google Maps Navigation has launched&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/8331824.stm"&gt;shares in sat-nav companies have already collapsed&lt;/a&gt; &amp;#8211; following my sharedealing friend&amp;#8217;s famous edict that you don&amp;#8217;t want to launch any product that Google can march into. But I&amp;#8217;m not so sure what they&amp;#8217;re worried about.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I used Google Maps on my Android phone a while ago to try and drive to a remote location. Sure, the interface was incredibly clunky and it wasn&amp;#8217;t the best set-up in the world &amp;#8211; but I&amp;#8217;d have been fine with that if it ACTUALLY WORKED. Ironically, while my phone had a GPS lock throughout the journey, it spent ages vainly looking for a data signal.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;No doubt Google can improve on the user interface and speed of the application &amp;#8211; but unless Google suddenly have powers to swamp the entire continent or planet with a coherent data signal, there&amp;#8217;s still going to be a lot of room for a &amp;#8220;traditional&amp;#8221; satellite navigation company. Because when you&amp;#8217;re lost, the last thing you want to find is that your freebie Google Maps device can&amp;#8217;t tell you where you are either because it can&amp;#8217;t download the relevant map of your location.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style="text-align: right"&gt;&lt;small&gt;Mirrored from &lt;a href="http://www.almostwitty.com/technology/why-google-maps-navigation-wont-be-that-huge" title="Read Original Post"&gt;almost witty&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;img src="https://www.dreamwidth.org/tools/commentcount?user=almostwitty&amp;ditemid=283989" width="30" height="12" alt="comment count unavailable" style="vertical-align: middle;"/&gt; comments</content>
  </entry>
</feed>
