almostwitty: From the American Museum of Natural History, between 1901-1904.  https://nextshark.com/19th-century-photo-eating-rice (archangel)
almostwitty ([personal profile] almostwitty) wrote2009-08-04 12:33 pm

What’s wrong with this Dalek?

What's wrong with this Dalek?

Answers in a couple of days … but feel free to guess in the comments below!

Mirrored from almost witty.

[identity profile] voodoo-vibe.livejournal.com 2009-08-04 11:42 am (UTC)(link)
The "arms" are the wrong way round? Apart from that, I dunno. Which makes me feel like a very bad little fangirl.

[identity profile] chiller.livejournal.com 2009-08-04 11:42 am (UTC)(link)
Is it Swine Floo?

[identity profile] twisted-times.livejournal.com 2009-08-04 11:51 am (UTC)(link)

The arms are the right way around but the arms (and eye stalk for that matter) look a far too sturdy - they were spindly fragile-looking affairs as I recall...

[identity profile] voodoo-vibe.livejournal.com 2009-08-04 11:57 am (UTC)(link)
Yes. Oh, BBC props dept., how I wish you were still as under-budgeted today as you were then. XD

[identity profile] gipsy-dreamer.livejournal.com 2009-08-04 12:00 pm (UTC)(link)
He has his eye stalk where the sucker should be and vice versa.

[identity profile] voodoo-vibe.livejournal.com 2009-08-04 12:07 pm (UTC)(link)
Oh yes! I didn't even notice. Well done you. :)

[identity profile] kiri-l.livejournal.com 2009-08-04 02:54 pm (UTC)(link)
Eyestalk and plunger reversed. it is a mini version. oh and blue dots .. bubbles. what are those things on the case called? Also obviously a cheap plastic.

[identity profile] hellmutt.livejournal.com 2009-08-04 03:33 pm (UTC)(link)
Did it died?

[identity profile] sentience.livejournal.com 2009-08-04 11:00 pm (UTC)(link)
The sucker and the eyefocus are the wrong way around.