almostwitty: From the American Museum of Natural History, between 1901-1904. https://nextshark.com/19th-century-photo-eating-rice (Default)
almostwitty ([personal profile] almostwitty) wrote2008-09-20 03:17 pm
  • Add Memory
  • Share This Entry

Relate 2.0

Why didn't this website exist the last time I had huge relationship traumas? (Although I doubt the evil ex would have taken the word of "perverted" websurfers as gospel...)

Fighting with your significant other? Who's right and who's wrong? Air it out anonymously while letting people of the world give you advice and make the decision on who should apologize. sidetaker.com
Flat | Top-Level Comments Only

[identity profile] babyraven.livejournal.com 2008-09-20 02:44 pm (UTC)(link)
Only problem with that is that with only one side of the argument posting, the results are skewed in the poster's favour. Not exactly a fair-and-balanced presentation of the issues.
almostwitty: From the American Museum of Natural History, between 1901-1904. https://nextshark.com/19th-century-photo-eating-rice (Default)

[personal profile] almostwitty 2008-09-20 03:22 pm (UTC)(link)
The other person could post back, I s'pose...

[identity profile] babyraven.livejournal.com 2008-09-20 03:36 pm (UTC)(link)
...aand thereby expand the argument into both the real AND virtual worlds.

Sounds like a bad idea to me.

[identity profile] shove-this-girl.livejournal.com 2008-09-20 05:47 pm (UTC)(link)
Pah, we had an offline way of dealing with that on the east coast - it was called evesdropping strangers in a crowded corner pub. EVERYONE had an opinion, and you were going to hear everyone's side (and generally their own backstories) before the night was up. :)
almostwitty: From the American Museum of Natural History, between 1901-1904. https://nextshark.com/19th-century-photo-eating-rice (Default)

[personal profile] almostwitty 2008-09-21 09:52 am (UTC)(link)
But surely if it was crowded, it'd also be loud thus making eavesdropping quite difficult?
Flat | Top-Level Comments Only