Aug. 29th, 2008

almostwitty: (evil)
These are the Twitters I sent over the last 24 hours...

  • 09:45 Is not sure he is old enough for alcohol any more #
  • 15:10 is still drooling over the mental image of a metric ton of pasta, as elegantly Twittered by sevitzdotcom #
  • 20:34 is coming back from gazing at fancy lg thin televisions at fulham palace. #
Powered with LoudTwitter
almostwitty: (evil)
In 2008, as America faces an economic downturn and recession with military forces overseas, America seems to have two choices. To stick with the current administration that's now governing over the recession, or go for an unusual candidate promising radical change, including a withdrawal of military forces.

In 1983, as Britain faced an economic downturn and recession with military forces overseas, Britain had two choices. To stick with the then-administration (Margaret Thatcher) that was governing over the recession, or go for an unusual candidate promising radical change, including a withdrawal of nuclear military forces. Britain voted overwhelmingly for the then-current administration.

There are - obviously - huge differences between the two situations, not least of which that Michael Foot was as old as John McCain at the time, and Margaret Thatcher was as significant as Barack Obama in terms of unusual background for a political leader.

Or there's this comparison:

In 2008, in an environment where there was a perceptive need for change, Barack Obama, the leading opposition candidate for the forthcoming election took to the stage in a huge sports arena, preceded by a rally with performances from key celebrities and music artists. The speech had huge media coverage.

In 1992 Britain, in an environment where there was a perceptive need for change, Neil Kinnock, the leading opposition candidate for the forthcoming election took to the stage in a huge sports arena, preceded by a rally with performances from key celebrities and music artists. The speech had huge media coverage. Labour went on to lose an election many commentators had thought they would win.

I just cannot see an electorate that voted for Dubya twice in 2000 and 2004 voting for a black man, no matter how charismatic and invigorating he is. Plus, even I have to cut'n'paste his name from a news article to get the spelling right, lest I confuse him with another infamous character with a similar name Or am I underestimating the American public from 6000 miles away? Who knows...

Profile

almostwitty: (Default)
almostwitty

August 2017

S M T W T F S
  12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20 212223242526
2728293031  

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 12th, 2025 03:29 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios