I would have thought that the main difference is that it's *obvious* that the Pussycat Dolls are part of a worldwide media conglomerate branding exercise run by a record company. Although to be fair, I think the main singer can actually, y'know, sing reasonably well.
Whereas Dita *is* the brand - if she decided to market herself by, say, singing or something, she'd have to be sucked into the marketing machine.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
timeasmymeasure
no subject
Date: 2009-05-26 02:07 pm (UTC)Whereas Dita *is* the brand - if she decided to market herself by, say, singing or something, she'd have to be sucked into the marketing machine.