almostwitty: From the American Museum of Natural History, between 1901-1904.  https://nextshark.com/19th-century-photo-eating-rice (evil)
almostwitty ([personal profile] almostwitty) wrote2007-11-09 01:24 pm
Entry tags:

The perils of dining out


A couple of nights ago, I decided to pop along to the North West Friends Dinner Group, a small meeting group just started up and dedicated towards good dinners.

So we (that is, myself and the misleadingly named [livejournal.com profile] scarletdemon) met at the City Cafe, part of the City Inn in Manchester, recently raved by Manchester Confidential with a few entertaining stories about the volatility of the chef.

Waiting to get into the City Cafe, the person in front of me (a distinguished older gent) greeted the maître d' with the immortal words:
"I don't want to eat. I just walked by and just wanted to tell you that you are gorgeous. Absolutely gorgeous."
He then shook the hand of the understandably stunned maître d' (imagine an older David Platt) and then walked off.

Gradually, a gang of about seven people assembled for dinner and conversation as we all got to know each other. Then the food arrived. It was lovely and tasted fine, but why are the portions so tiny ?! The little haddock-on-bread I took a picture of cost £10. No side dishes - I had to order extra. There's barely enough there to do more than taste and sniff at the food.

Or am I just a greedy sod? Is this the portion I should expect to get in a posh hotel restaurant?

[identity profile] kiri-l.livejournal.com 2007-11-09 02:45 pm (UTC)(link)
it's called Haute Cuisine. ;)

[identity profile] britgeekgrrl.livejournal.com 2007-11-09 07:02 pm (UTC)(link)
I bloody HATE the trend of "It's haute cuisine, therefore you must leave hungrier than you arrived"

"California cuisine" gets bashed about a lot (even here in California!) but at least the better chefs seem to understand that people are HUNGRY at dinnertime!