[identity profile] charlycrash.livejournal.com 2010-10-12 10:47 am (UTC)(link)
Would be even better if you could read it :P

[identity profile] charlycrash.livejournal.com 2010-10-12 10:48 am (UTC)(link)
Oh, wait. If you click on the image it's too small to be legible. If you click on the link, you get a bigger one.

[identity profile] charlycrash.livejournal.com 2010-10-12 10:48 am (UTC)(link)
No, the one you uploaded is too small.

[identity profile] flyslip.livejournal.com 2010-10-12 12:52 pm (UTC)(link)
And my screen is too small.

[identity profile] badnoodles.livejournal.com 2010-10-12 01:47 pm (UTC)(link)
My only comment would be that a character without flaws is a boring fucking character, not a strong female character.

[identity profile] badnoodles.livejournal.com 2010-10-12 02:37 pm (UTC)(link)
durr, I managed to swap a no/yes in the first line. much better.

[identity profile] anivair.livejournal.com 2010-10-12 01:50 pm (UTC)(link)
I love how material like this pretends that there is no such thing as a strong female character. get it? Because strong female characters can't be crazy or sexy or have ties to things. they can't be attached to men, because women is real life are all sane asexual people with no flaws, no problems, and who have no defining traits at all.

[identity profile] britgeekgrrl.livejournal.com 2010-10-12 01:53 pm (UTC)(link)
I want to send copies of this to every screenwriter - pro or otherwise - in the world. Pure awesome.