Date: 2010-10-12 10:47 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] charlycrash.livejournal.com
Would be even better if you could read it :P

Date: 2010-10-12 10:48 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] charlycrash.livejournal.com
Oh, wait. If you click on the image it's too small to be legible. If you click on the link, you get a bigger one.

Date: 2010-10-12 10:48 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] charlycrash.livejournal.com
No, the one you uploaded is too small.

Date: 2010-10-12 12:52 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] flyslip.livejournal.com
And my screen is too small.

Date: 2010-10-12 01:47 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] badnoodles.livejournal.com
My only comment would be that a character without flaws is a boring fucking character, not a strong female character.

Date: 2010-10-12 02:37 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] badnoodles.livejournal.com
durr, I managed to swap a no/yes in the first line. much better.

Date: 2010-10-12 01:50 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] anivair.livejournal.com
I love how material like this pretends that there is no such thing as a strong female character. get it? Because strong female characters can't be crazy or sexy or have ties to things. they can't be attached to men, because women is real life are all sane asexual people with no flaws, no problems, and who have no defining traits at all.

Date: 2010-10-12 01:53 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] britgeekgrrl.livejournal.com
I want to send copies of this to every screenwriter - pro or otherwise - in the world. Pure awesome.

Profile

almostwitty: From the American Museum of Natural History, between 1901-1904.  https://nextshark.com/19th-century-photo-eating-rice (Default)
almostwitty

December 2025

S M T W T F S
 123456
7891011 1213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031   

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Dec. 26th, 2025 02:40 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios